Wireless iPod?
2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of
2.
Once in a while some hapless media type manages
to get an interview with my man Steve Jobs and invariably they ask him about the
possibility of a wireless iPod. Being tech writers - and therefore being given
endless swag by every company with a product to sell - these mopes usually have
Bluetooth headsets on their phones, and they wonder why they need to have a
cord
running to their ears so that they can listen to
music.Steve then proceeds to rip them
a nice shiny new asshole, pointing out a couple of
things:
One, the bandwidth of Bluetooth is way too
narrow to stream music. It might be fine for voice over cell, but listening to
music through a BT link would be akin to listening to music with Windoze Media
Player ... way too lo-fi to bother
with.Two, nobody wants to be
recharging their headphones all the
time.For the most part he is right on
target with both of these objections. But ... and we are entering the realm of
some pretty tenuous conjecture here ... there is still some reason to believe
that the idea of a wireless iPod is
not
completely stupid. There is a company that most people have never heard of
called "PortalPlayer" ... they make a fairly large chunk
of the custom silicon that you will find in the guts of any iPod. PortalPlayer
makes about 95% of its fairly healthy revenue this way, so you would be safe to
assume that any major decisions or announcements that they make would have
something to do with the 'pod. The connection? They recently confirmed the addition of a bona fide
wireless bigwig to their Board of Directors. Doing the math here is
fairly simple - some part of their product line is going wireless, and the only
real product line they have is iPod hardware.
Stay tuned.
Posted: Fri - December
16, 2005 at 12:03 AM